The Blazing World by
Siri Hustvedt
My rating:
5 of 5 stars
This is a novel made up of accounts, interviews, and journal entries that are more quotes than narrative and yet it was one of the most compelling, interesting, enjoyable books I've read in a while. Harriet Burden is a middle-aged female artist who feels she her art has been ignored because of her gender (and maybe because of her age and station, as well). She has several male artists show her work as her own, as a social experiment, and to vindicate her artistry as well. What results is not what she or the reader expects, I could feel her Harriet's frustration mount and almost hear her banging her head against the proverbial wall. Her art revolves around boxes with scenes in them, whose meanings are not always clear. I felt like the narrative was similar-- a series of boxes with scenes that put together make a whole, though there is still plenty of mystery left. This is definitely a book I will read again and again to try to put the puzzle all together, noticing different pieces perhaps, than the first time I read it, but somehow each time I know it will be a masterpiece.
View all my reviews
This amnesia is our phenomenology of the everyday--we don't see ourselves--and what we see becomes us while we're looking at it.
When I look at the picture now, I am struck by its banality, but also by how much it hides. As a vehicle of memory, it resist inner reality. The document of an instant, it records what we looked like then. The high feeling that ran between us, the secrecy of our confidences, the pact of friendship we made--all of that is missing.
we know so little about ourselves it's shocking. We tell ourselves a story and we go along believing in it, and then, it turns out, it's the wrong story, which means we've lived the wrong life.
In order to sell art, you had to "create desire," and "desire," he said, "cannot be satisfied because then it's no longer desire." The thing that is truly wanted must always be missing. "Art dealers have to be magicians of hunger."
I can't say it like she did, but she told me that people have different names for the same things, depending on what interests they have, but the words can also change how we see things.
Before long, she said, her answers and comments became his. No one owns language. Do we remember the sources of our own ideas, our own words? They have to come from somewhere, don't they?
I talked about fantasy then, which lies at the heart of my work with patients, but the inner world and the other world can be difficult to separate , and the place where they conjoin of divide has been a blurry business in psychoanalysis from the beginning. We invent them, I said to Harry, the people we love and hate. We project our feelings onto other people, but there is always a dynamic that creates those inventions. The fantasies are made between people, and the ideas about those people live inside us.
And then maybe we attribute more vanity to beautiful people than to the plain, and perhaps that isn't fair.
Is pain more durable than joy in memory?
Human beings are the only animals who kill for ideas.
belief is a complex mixture of suggestion, mimicry, desire, and projection.
If we had no past visual experiences, we could not make sense of the visible world. Without repetition, the seen world is nonsense.