Varina by Charles FrazierMy rating: 3 of 5 stars
The wife of Jefferson Davis tells her story to a free black man whom she raised as her son until the end of the Civil War when they were separated. The story spirals...going to from one time period to the next, barely progressing the storyline. It’s beautifully written and has a unique point of view. But the meandering plotline makes it seem as long and tiresome as their escape to Florida.
View all my reviews
She gathered the children to her, hugging each of them separately and then all together like an enormous stinky bouquet.
V pulled open a cupboard drawer and found a sprinkling of mouse droppings. The oblong black nubs moved like suddenly magnetized iron filings or swirled tea leaves until they settled and found their pattern on the drawer bottom. Prophetic, but not subtly so. Just another message from the gods about diminishing expectations.
He theorized amnesia relieves melancholia. Which makes complete sense, because memory is so often to blame for it. Who couldn’t use their load of time and history lightened?
Make up your addled young mind too soon and afterward—unless you are a true and total rebel—your way forward in life narrows down to the dimensions of a railroad tunnel. Or, a better and more modern simile, to the horrific pinching aperture of a camera shutter, metal plates wrapping onto themselves, constricting, until the mechanism quickly opens and then closes for good with the snap of a trap, fixing you in a moment you’ll regret to the grave.
Don’t think about the existence of an artifact representative of that time, the whipping post. It played no direct part in their decades together. One could be with them for days and forget that their fundamental relationship was anything but friendship and respect and mutual responsibility stretching back to youth. But then something would happen. A small shift in Jeff’s tone of voice asking for the second time that some minor task be done, a moment of ignoring Pemberton as if he weren’t there. Flashes of language and particular tones of rudeness revealed that the relationship between the two men was deeply complex. That the fundamental note of their long history together condensed to a simple fact—one member of the friendship was owner and the other was both labor and capital. And then the shadow of that post traced divisions clear and precise as the sweeping shadow of a sundial.
The idea was, the you you are with others is not you. To be lonesome is to be who you most fully are.
A sorry realization when you know the best you can offer is not your presence but your absence.





